Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €97.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX
Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX