Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
