Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- With a maximum drag of 9.6 out of 10 (8kg), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin REDIX
