Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Catana FE?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
