Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Catana FE?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX
