Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Catana FE?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX
