Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sahara 4000 R?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3 kg / 6.61 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
