Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Spinning
63.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.33 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a maximum drag of 4kg / 8.82 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8.82 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
