Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Abu GARCIA Zenon and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.1 out of 10 (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
