Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Abu GARCIA Revo MGX?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
