Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
