Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (8.58 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
