Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
