Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX
