Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin RAYA body vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
