Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82cm / 32.28 inch) and maximum drag (4 kg). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
