Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82cm / 32.28 inch) and maximum drag (4 kg). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
