Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (7.58 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
