Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (6.63 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Penn Squall II Levelwind?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
- At a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
