Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and total score (7.38 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
