Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
