Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €20.30, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX
