Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
