Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.53 out of 10) and total score (7.9 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
