Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
