Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, maximum drag and durability. If you must choose between them, Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
