Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and total score (7.08 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Penn Slammer IV?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin YUPIE
