Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.53 out of 10) and total score (7.9 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
