Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
