Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF

Spinning

38.20 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.56 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €23.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €661.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizePC 2500D-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.