Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, maximum drag and durability. If you must choose between them, Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
