Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Penn Battle III?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
