Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.53 out of 10) and total score (7.9 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
