Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
