Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and durability (5.98 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Penn International VISW?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX
