Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Spinning

51.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.7 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.5:1

Maximum drag-

Weight370g / 13.05oz

Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €32.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Abu GARCIA Zenon

Spinning

83.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.47 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs

Weight160g / 5.64oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandABU GARCIA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €326.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 SH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Abu GARCIA Zenon?

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.