Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
57.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF offers a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
