Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX edges out Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the weight (290g / 10,23oz). Still, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch and a gear ratio of 5.5:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
