Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
