Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
