Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
Delphin INKS 3000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX
Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X