Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
