Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
