Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
