Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
