Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €479.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
