Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and weight (250g / 8,82oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X
