Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and weight (285g / 10,05oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
