Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF offers a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, while Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa BG MQ?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8.77 out of 10 (430g / 15,17oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX
