Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF offers a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, while Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Scoring 8.21 out of 10 (625g / 22,05oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX
