Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200
Conclusion
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa RX LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
